Review Results

Comment

The only change in this .SRCINFO hunk is a pkgrel bump from 1 to 2. There are no source, build, install, dependency, or script changes shown here, so this diff does not introduce any new security risk on its own. It appears to be a packaging revision only.

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 pkgbase = caffeine-ng
 	pkgdesc = Status bar application able to temporarily inhibit the screensaver and sleep mode.
 	pkgver = 4.3.2
-	pkgrel = 1
+	pkgrel = 2
 	url = https://codeberg.org/WhyNotHugo/caffeine-ng
 	arch = any
 	license = GPL-3.0-or-later

Comment

The change only updates the recorded SHA-512 checksum for the existing upstream source tarball URL on Codeberg. The source URL remains HTTPS and points to the same upstream release archive; there are no new sources, build steps, install scripts, or packaging directives introduced. This looks like a routine integrity metadata update rather than a supply-chain risk.

@@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ pkgbase = caffeine-ng
 	replaces = caffeine-oneclick
 	replaces = caffeine-systray
 	source = https://codeberg.org/WhyNotHugo/caffeine-ng/archive/v4.3.2.tar.gz
-	sha512sums = 5b74773b53a76df431145dcc01466b3648f727e1d35cf6dde216e07b6b5a1ec97a7325f9f8c02bd188f5aa17b89aa55ce68bfb6b63a1e8bf4676383314749158
+	sha512sums = 96e9c65d1e9094ddc8f4fe59880280b0a3860b829d473e15a05fba9a3406bb1a1aaac55914ac7703064e15fc57a0e149c0217352512e9162af69a66d9149e8db
 
 pkgname = caffeine-ng

Comment

This change only bumps pkgrel from 1 to 2 in PKGBUILD and does not alter sources, build steps, dependencies, install scripts, or packaging behavior. No security-relevant content is introduced by the diff shown.

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 pkgname=caffeine-ng
 pkgver=4.3.2
-pkgrel=1
+pkgrel=2
 pkgdesc="Status bar application able to temporarily inhibit the screensaver and sleep mode."
 arch=(any)
 url="https://codeberg.org/WhyNotHugo/caffeine-ng"

Comment

The change only updates the SHA-512 checksum for the upstream tarball source URL. The source remains an HTTPS Codeberg release archive for the same tagged version, with no new build steps, scripts, binaries, or packaging logic introduced. I don’t see any added supply-chain, persistence, or privilege-escalation risk in this diff.

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ replaces=(caffeine-oneclick caffeine-systray)
 #source=("https://codeberg.org/WhyNotHugo/caffeine-ng/releases/download/v${pkgver}/caffeine-ng-v${pkgver}.tar.gz")
 # As per AUR comment from upstream author, tagged versions can be considered "releases"
 source=("https://codeberg.org/WhyNotHugo/${pkgname}/archive/v${pkgver}.tar.gz")
-sha512sums=('5b74773b53a76df431145dcc01466b3648f727e1d35cf6dde216e07b6b5a1ec97a7325f9f8c02bd188f5aa17b89aa55ce68bfb6b63a1e8bf4676383314749158')
+sha512sums=('96e9c65d1e9094ddc8f4fe59880280b0a3860b829d473e15a05fba9a3406bb1a1aaac55914ac7703064e15fc57a0e149c0217352512e9162af69a66d9149e8db')
 
 build() {
   cd "$srcdir/caffeine-ng"